2.5/4  www.neverpickupstrangers.com
This is one of two actually good hitchiker films. Don't watch the remake, cause... Well Michael Bay had something to do with it so you know how that turned out... This is a great film though. A classic and made people really think to never... (read full)

4/4  The Hitcher Quick Review
This is a great film! I loved the hitcher character, was brilliantly calm and terrifying at the same time. The atmosphere was excellent.

2.5/4  The Hitcher Quick Review
It moves a little too slow for my taste, but the Hitcher has some tense scenes and Rutger Hauer is damn scary as a smart, sneaky serial killer. It builds and builds and the end is kind of letdown for me - even if it is dark.

5/5 Full-Throttle Action, All The Way!
  by Vince
To start with, I'm tired of those idiots who give away an entire plot, instead of just reviewing the movie. Every movie I check out, there's at at least 5 morons who give away everything, and don't even talk about the movie (yes, it's possible). So, with that, read on if you're still interested.

This movie is categorized as either thriller/horror. I would say that it's more of an action-adventure/thriller. Sure, you'll see blood and gore, but for the most part, this is an edge-of-your-seat-action ride of a movie. If it helps, I would say that this movie has more action than your typical action movie. If you took your typical movie, with around 2 hours of screen time, and cut out all the unnecessary BS, and jacked it full of action, then you would get "The Hitcher".

The plot does seeem simple, and the unknown actors do not give the greatest performance, but the movie is still awesome, no matter what. If you're tired of the current state of horror genre movies, from the past 8 years, then you might take a liking to this movie. Whereas your typical so called thriller/horror movies follow the same, lame predictable story line, this does things just a little differently. Plus, the production, camera angles, and camera shooting are all top-notch. This is a movie that is not painful to watch because it wasn't shot properly, or the sound was off. Film production was done right. As you might notice from the other reviewers, the complaints are all about the story, and not the film production.

The Bottom Line: Kick-a** movie that you'll watch over and over again, defintely a surprise hit for me. I didn't expect any new movie to be this good.

NOTE: The extra features include behind the scenes, and making of footage, for those who want it.

----"The True Critic"

3/5 This movie rocks!
  by Amber M. Smith (Bristol, CT USA)
I really enjoyed this movie. I purchases it because I owned it before and it was stolen, so it was definitely good enough to buy again. I think it could have used some more gore, but still a good plot. Plus the actor who plays the psychotic hitchhiking killer is hot!

5/5 The Hitcher
  by Robert
i liked the first 2 parts but i love the remake better than the other 2..
this one was scariier than the original..
10/10
The special effects are fabulous, the actors superb, and I am thrilled and delighted with this remake.
This is one of the better thriller movies I have seen. The mix of suspense and violence is just right and will keep you watching until the end.


3/5 Bean steals it
  by kristin724 (New Jersey USA)

Who didn't love to hate Sean Bean when the English actor first came onto the US radar in 1992's Patriot Games? Following with another villainous turn in the initial Pierce Brosnan Bond flick Goldeneye (1995), it is no wonder American audiences didn't begin to appreciate the versatile actor until Bean's understated performance as the ill-fated Boromir in The Lord of The Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.



Always popular overseas as Napoleonic hero Richard Sharpe in the British television series of the same name, Sean Bean's most recent high profile American picture was this winter's The Hitcher, a remake of the 1986 Rutger Hauer yarn about a psychotic hitchhiker who trails innocents and frames them for his crimes. Directed by famed music video helmsman Dave Meyers, The Hitcher boasts production support from mega action chairman Michael Bay (Armageddon, The Rock) and Matthew Cohan-who also fronted the edgy and popular remakes of The Amityville Horror and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (as well as the sci-fi flick The Island-also starring Bean).

Unfortunately, The Hitcher failed to further shiver mid January movie going audiences. Incredibly short at under 1 hour 25 minutes, The Hitcher might have been over priced for theaters. Do however, look for the recent DVD release in your video store's sale bin.
Now back to Sean Bean. Despite being a horror enthusiast, I wouldn't have picked up The Hitcher for rising stars Sophia Bush or Zachary Knighton. Even cult favorite Neal McDonough (Star Trek: First Contact) was a pleasant surprise, but I won't kid you-I bought The Hitcher for the 48 year old Bean. Once considered by fans as the most beloved Hauer film, The Hitcher now belongs to Sean Bean.


The Hitcher's story begins when college cuties Grace Andrews (Bush) and Jim Halsey (Knighton) take off across the American Southwest for Spring Break-in a classic 442 no less. Unfortunately, after encountering seemingly pedestrian hitchhiker John Ryder (Bean), their lives quickly turn to carnage, terror, and high speed pursuit. Ryder initially attacks the couple, but they manage to escape him- only to find he has killed others and is framing them for his rampage. New Mexico State Police Lieutenant Eldridge (McDonough) pursues Grace and Jim-who look more and more like the killers with every turn.

I have to admit, I first though Sophia Bush to be one of President Bush's daughters! Young starlets are so interchangeable in Hollywood today, and the B horror flick is often where new names perfect their death scene antics. The One Tree Hill star does hold her own here in the otherwise all male cast. Of course she looks the pretty for the part, but Bush carries an untraditional edge and non-blonde bimbo look that fits the ballsy chick here. Nothing against TV guester Zachary Knighton, but his performance was a dime a dozen. Screenwriter Eric Red was smart to turn this version's focus on Grace-as opposed to the original's hold on C. Thomas Howell's Halsey. It's 2007, yet Knighton's look harkens back to the nineties grunge and skater style. I didn't find it attractive then, and I certainly don't believe this Jim will be the star of Spring Break any time soon. Whether it's poor skill or by design, here Jim is a limp fish next to Bean's Ryder.


While not exactly a sex symbol in the US in his day, Bean's psycho turn here is nonetheless the most attractive thing in The Hitcher. Yes he's older now, and well, he does have a big nose, but Bean's command of these college kids is evident from the moment they almost hit him on the road. The complexity of Ryder-who is he? Where does he come from? What does he want?- is more interesting than seeing if Grace and Jim make it. It's a horror flick-we know someone isn't going to survive-but in some part of the back of your mind, you want that tawdry ending where Ryder walks off into the sunset to nab another wayward couple.


Although I expected the film to be billed as `And Sean Bean as The Hitcher', he is rightfully given top billing, followed by Sophia Bush. He's twice her age-old enough to be her father-yet Bean and Bush (hee) have some interesting chemistry onscreen. Maybe as a woman it's the fear of rape, or perhaps its my one to many viewings of Bean in the steamy Lady Chatterley, but I was routing for physical action between these two for the duration. You can't have a rugged, mean Bean and a short skirted Bush without some rough potential. Meyer does give the audience a fine balance of hints and foreplay and lots of f-bombed dialogue. Kudos also to whoever decided to give Sheffield born and bred Sean an American accent. Knowing his true and definitely British accent is being hidden here adds to Ryder's creepiness. If even that isn't true about Ryder, what else is there lying there, waiting?

While I haven't seen the Rutger Hauer version of The Hitcher in some time, the 2007 version reminds me more of Stephen Spielberg's early road rage classic Duel. Bean's performance is akin to Duel's crazy and dubious tractor trailer more so than Hauer. For myself, Blade Runner is the creepy Hauer flick and Ladyhawke is my favorite of his films. Hauer's most iconic moment in The Hitcher, however, now belongs to Sean Bean. The `late model black thunderbird' car chase and shoot `em up has even my honey rooting for villainous Bean.

I'm a bit tired of remakes and sequels, and it's a double edged sword to know The Hitcher is in Matthew Cohan's line of horror revisits. On one hand, the story is very familiar, but then again, Cohan and his team have seemed to perfect the art of maintaining the best of the original and infusing it with modern filmmaking. The visuals and creative deaths in this Hitcher could not have been done in the eighties. Lighting, however, seems to suffer for Meyer's fast paced music video style. Sometimes The Hitcher is almost too dark to see anything. Sure maybe it adds to atmosphere or mood, but we want to watch the action in the creepy desert jailhouse. Equally jarring is Meyer's cuts to outside action. Beautiful open desert shots have even the actors noticeably squinting.

Another place The Hitcher misses more than hits is its somewhat low body count. Indeed perhaps it is even too short for its own horror/car chase genre. Near the end of the film, I found myself missing ensemble horror road trip films- where one by one the nobodys and bimbos are picked off. It might have been interesting to see Grace and Jim with a buddy couple who meets their end courtesy of John Ryder-or perhaps that scenario could have put the film beyond believability. The Hitcher is also partially undone with its over simple dialogue. Some of it is really great-Eldridge's hick cop banter and Ryder's ambiguous one liners bring humor and food for thought, but our couple utters too many cries along the lines of `What does he want? Why is he doing this?'. Even the bullseye gem `I'll be back in 15 minutes' makes a cameo.



Although The Hitcher came and went in theaters, I expected the DVD release to have more features than it does. There's an up close segment on Knighton and his definitive bloodfest scene, plus a detailed behind the scenes look with the complete cast and crew. For fans who want to know the ins and outs of all the car stunts-here it is. I was, however, disappointed with the deleted scenes and alternate ending. Outtakes would have been a real treat, but instead we get four different versions of how one hotel room scene could have gone down. Indeed deleted scenes are usually deleted for a reason, and the way that hotel room scene is finalized in the film is the superior outcome.

The alternate ending was a little over the top for theaters-as the cover promised-but not nearly as extreme as it could have been. The highlight of the features for me was Sophia Bush confessing she was really afraid of Sean Bean!

If you don't like spooks, cars, and gore, then The Hitcher is not for you. Are there scarier and more gory horror films out there? More serious and hard core action, high speed thrillers? Of course, but you can't find solid acting and character complexity in Jason X.

Perhaps what is the creepiest thing about The Hitcher is that this kind of road rage can happen and does happen. This film is a must see for Sean Bean fans or Sophia Bush lovers. Perhaps the question is not to purchase this DVD, but rather what would you do if one of the S.B.s was thumbing for a ride on your street?


2/5 Tea: If I knew then what I know now, I'd pass on this one
  by Alexis Smith
If you have already seen the original movie from 1986, not the remake which is this movie, you'll probably be watching this flick with a preconceived notion of how the movie is gonna go. And you would be pretty much wrong...all around.
If you haven't ever seen the original movie, then this movie might be okay for you. Might even get a little suspense out of it...might even enjoy it.
Those of us that have seen the original, and thought it was brilliant, are going to be sorely disappointed in this factory version..yet another example of the Hollywood machine's constant need to remake a great movie. And it wasn't the actors, either. I'd find fault in the studio, executive producer, and the producers. I'm all for updating a movie, if you're going to make it better. I just wasn't feeling that on this one.