3.5/4  A compelling real life thriller
A film that is interesting due to the fact that it is historically accurate enough, although it is fairly easy to notice when it is not accurate and that it is a recent event. The film is an effective and interesting thriller. With a origi... (read full)

3/4  Breach
With all the glamourized CIA films, people tend to have this idea that working for the CIA is action-packed. Working for the CIA is a job. And like most jobs, it can get pretty tiresome. I like how this film is true to that. I think this i... (read full)

3/4  A must see!
This is a very good movie, based on the real life investigation of Robert Hannssen, who for years passed confidential information to the Russians. Chris Cooper plays Hannssen in a way that is very surprising. You know right away what Han... (read full)

3/4  under rated
I'm not a Phillipe fan but I thought he was good in this. He actually looks older than 13 now adays too. This movie had great suspense and did a good job of portraying the relationship between the two main characters. I think this is pr... (read full)

2/4  Breach Quick Review
I like the fact this is based on a true, and recent story. It does make it compelling, but, for me, it was also completely boring. I never identified with any of the characters and found myself drifting.

1/5 DON'T BUY THIS
  by W. BUTLER (NEVADA USA)
Literally or figuratively.

Firstly, not for one second did Chris Cooper persuade me he was Robert Hanssen. As he looks nothing like Hanssen the "suspension of disbelief" necessary to become involved in the outcome of this "thriller" was negated the moment one sees Cooper.

Photographs of Hanssen show a burly man with a toothy smile who one could well imagine having 6 children. The ideal type to be a career bureaucrat attending pointless good-old-boy meetings for 25 years. Whereas Cooper is a smaller acerbic type and a born eccentric. Any civil servant with that kind of weird personality would have been sent packing after 2 years of unflattering reviews. (I too write from experience)

I believe the producers cast Cooper with the sole intention of cashing-in on his unforgettable performance in "The Bourne Identity". Another sad comparison being the boss lady in both films was played by an attractive blonde. Laura Lynley never convinced me either she could be a hard-nosed spy bureaucrat (as did Joan Allen).

The less said about the nominal hero the better. This movie was obviously his "vanity project". A small fish whose need or ability to outshine Hanssen made no sense at all. Except as fiction - to introduce fake-tension into the latter stages of a "thriller" which had no natural thrills.

What a crazy genius like Hanssen requires is an insightful 2-hour documentary extending way beyond the phenomena of "turned spies". Orwell's DOUBLETHINK being so common in every walk of life no one can believe a word any politician says. Inevitably leading to our present-day loss of good-natured honest-to-God American values.

To sum up - making this movie - where one didn't exist - can now be seen as a waste of everybody's time and money.

4/5 Impecable Acting by Chris Cooper
  by Morten Lokkegaard (Copenhagen, Denmark)
Just resaw this movie and was spellbound, not so much by the story (which was compelling), but by Chris Coopers action. Having really only gotten acquainted to Cooper in American Beauty where he in my mind topped the list of an awful lot of top rate performances, I must say his acting in this movie matched if not surpassed it.

Possibly because he in this movie finally was the lead and the audience then had 'more of him' he gave examples of his incredible array of facial expressions and emotions, and often subdued / hard to grasp ones. True acting is not about the lines they carry but the ability to truly make the audience identify with the character. Chris Cooper could carry a movie without uttering a word - his expressions, body language etc says more than a thousand words.

Many reviews focus on the accuracy of the portrayal of the case which frankly to me is secondary. For one no one truly knows what did happen and what caused Hanssen to do what he did... and due to the nature of the crime no one likely ever will - and is that really so important. It certainly takes nothing away from the compelling story in this movie and the sublime acting.

5/5 Outstanding Acting by Chris Cooper
  by M. Linn (San Francisco)
This movie came out with apparently little or no hoop-la. It is definitely one of the best films of the year. I watched it 2 x.

3/5 The Capture of a Top Spy
  by Acute Observer (North Jersey Shore)
A young FBI agent is given a new assignment: to spy on a top FBI manager because of his unusual sexual hobby on the Internet. What can Eric O'Neill learn about Robert Hanssen, the highly skilled expert on Soviet Espionage? Is he as moral as his desk ornaments suggest? He belongs to the same church as Director Freeh. Top management in the FBI comes from the law enforcement side, not desk analysts. [Practical experience?] There are some humorous scenes in this serious drama. Their retirement age is 57; Hanssen will have 25 years of service. The meetings are at night in a public place, just like in novels. They finally tell Eric the truth about Hanssen - he likes strippers!

For years they could never find the suspected mole who was responsible for assets that disappeared. Finally they figured out the reason why [after paying millions to get the name of Ramon]. We see how a ruse is used to get Hanssen out of his office so his SD micro card can be copied. [Wouldn't a regular computer operate much faster?] We see a "power play" where a meeting is scheduled only to be canceled. We see how a traffic jam is created on a highway in order to delay a suspect. And a lie is hidden by a truth. They know how to open mail without leaving a trace. [Fingerprints on a VHS cassette?] Bugs in a car create static on the radio, or set off car alarms. Agent Eric wants one more try to get Hanssen to make his drop. "Can I trust you?"

Does the stress on Hanssen cause him to act strange? [Or is it guilt?] There is a dramatic scene in a park. [Washington DC is not a gun-free zone.] This seems to give confidence to Hanssen so he will make another drop of secret information. But this time he is captured. "Maybe now you'll listen." [What could he be thinking?] "Pray for me" seems ironic.

There seem to be as many locks on the doors in Washington DC as an apartment in New York city. Eric brought down "the worst spy in American history". [Really? What about Benedict Arnold?] Hanssen got paid for revealing sources on the other side. Didn't he realize it was only a matter of time before someone on the other side got paid the same way? Why did Eric quit the FBI? Having a wife born in a foreign country would handicap him [in my opinion].
This is an interesting film but it doesn't seem as good as "Confessions of a Nazi Spy" or "The House on 92nd Street".

4/5 Chris Cooper makes a great creep
  by Bradley F. Smith (Miami Beach, FL)
Cooper has played this same creepy guy role a million times, and that's because there's something about his expression that is perfect for these characters. It's a mix of righteousness, disappointment, creepy moralism with just the right amount of mystery mixed in. He is perfect as Robert Hansen, the spy who somehow managed to outwit the entire US security apparatus for 20 years while doing more damage than any spy in history. You wonder just how bad the government spy programs must be for one guy to be able to do this. The movie, though we know the ending, is suspenseful because the suspense revolves around the young agent assigned to help bring Hansen down, not whether or not the spy would be caught. Good script. See this asap.