3/5 Too many flashbacks, voice-overs and strange devices
  by Bradley F. Smith (Miami Beach, FL)
The is awash in hard to follow flashbacks, inner character voices, animations, slow-motions, rapid cuts and time shifting. If you can get through all that, then the movie is some silliness about a revenge fantasy by the main character. Problem is the concept is way tooo hard to follow. The number of bad guys gets confusing, and the weird business about a fatal disease, loan sharks and the insufferable nonsense about high philosophies in defeating one's enemies gets on one's nerves long before it all comes to a merciful end. Also, the violence is bloodily graphic and sadistic. I guess Guy Ritchie was taking his Madonna frustrations out here.

4/5 The Prisoner for the ages
  by Essel C. (Fontana, CA USA)
This movie was confusing- but in a good way. In the beginning we see a man being released from prison, but really it's just exchanging one kind of prison for another. This movie takes you on a wild ride, but when it's over, you want to get back on the ride again to see what you missed the first time. I liked it.

4/5 Strange & twisted
  by Octavio Padilla Valenzuela
Good movie, but only If you have a taste for strange not so coherent, mind puzzling histories.

3/5 I love Guy Ritchie's stuff, BUT ...
  by C. ANZIULEWICZ (Spring Hill, WV USA)
Yikes, THIS is a difficult flick to review! On the plus side there's a complicated but intriguing plot in which Jake (Jason Statham) is doing his best to stay a least a few steps ahead of the other players in what appears to be an exquisitely elaborate con game. And there's Guy Ritchies relentlessly hip, hyperrealistic visual style. But on the minus side, there's precious little of the humor that made previous Ritchie movies like "Lock, Stock" and "Snatch" so much fun. And WORST of all: Just when you think Revolver is finally going to come to some sort of satisfying resolution, the film completely jumps the shark in the last 15 minutes and becomes something trying to be far too clever and psychologically profound for its own good.

I do have to give Guy Ritchie credit for acknowledging, in an interview to be found in the DVD extras, some of the vitriolic reviews the movie got upon release. "Revolver" is not a bad film, the former Mr. Madonna has got a lot of talent, and upon repeated viewings and pondering this might ultimately be considered a pretty deep film wrapped in a violent, stylish package. But for a single evenings entertainment "Revolver" proves to be disappointing. Ill be generous and give it 3 stars anyway and HOPE that Ritchie redeems himself with "RockNRolla," which is next on my list of Guy Ritchie films to watch.

5/5 A mindblowing film
  by M. Emery (MO, United States)
On the basis of "RocknRolla" and this film, Guy Ritchie is now my favorite director currently making films. The film got generally poor reviews, both on its 2005 UK release and 2007 American re-edited version (which is what I saw). However, I decided to give it a try anyway because I liked his other films. Glad I did, because this film reminded me of the excitement and challenge of films like Robert Altman's "Images" and "3 Women" (both produced in the 1970s). I take it as a compliment that a director is willing to treat his audience as up for a challenge. How many films from the last decade is that true of?

Watching the film is like wandering into a maze and realizing it's going to take some time to figure your way out of it. Ritchie's script plants a lot of clues, and on the DVD commentary he and his editor reveal what the intention of the film was, but that just scratches the surface. It's not hard to "get" the film if you're willing to give it some effort (I played it, then heard the commentary track, then played it again). The performances are excellent, the cinematography and scoring both strong. I'm not sure it's quite the work of genius some of its cult admirers claim for it. Some of the allusions Ritchie builds into the film strike me as private conceits, like an Easter egg hunt to see how many the viewer can find. Regardless of their significance, they're fun. For instance, why is the film's heavy (played by Ray Liotta) named "Dorothy"? A macho tough guy with a woman's name. Well, I have a suggestion. All the way through the third viewing I was thinking of "The Wizard of Oz," because Jake Green is in the position of Dorothy in that film, trapped in a bizarre world attempting to fight a way out of it, only to discover the power to do so lay within him all along. Of course, Dorothy and Jake in this film are alter egos. But who knows whether that is what Ritchie intended?

Ultimately, I like "RocknRolla" better, but this film is well worth seeing and thinking about. I recommend it.