5/5 Directors (ugly cover) trumps Spike (pretty cover)
  by PlusOne (Houston, TX United States)
If you liked Afro Samurai, then you'll probably want to see the second part, and so here you are. The director's cut is a better version than the Spike version. The differences really are the language editing (It bothers me when the "edited" word sounds forced/odd) and the omission of 1-2 second PG-13ish footage. Actually, I think it's harder to find the Spike version (with the better cover).



3/5 Kinda falls short
  by Niels Bohr (Ohio)
The first Afro took 10 years to create and its awesomeness shows it. This one seems more like a hurried wannabe trying to rake in some more cash off of the name. Not to say that its not top notch animation but it feels weak and was a bit boring at times. I wish I would have rented this instead of buying it.

3/5 Disappointing.
  by B. Hines (Rex, Ga.)
The first Warrior was just insane, a little hard to follow, but it added to the excitment. This installiment is bigger in every way, so why isnt it just as good? Well I guess the more money spent doesn't make a better movie. Started off interesting, good story, but all the computer effects and a lackluster soundtrack kinda bring this one down, try it again guys but please stick to what gave this moive its flare.

3/5 More of the same.
  by Michael W. Heinz (Phoenixville, PA USA)
Not great, not bad. In many ways it's a simple re-hash of the original plot, bringing back all the old characters even though doing so undermines the original story.

As such, it lacks the creative spark that made the original so amazing.

5/5 Which one is better
  by Caleb P. Erb
Awesome for sure maybe as good or better than the first. RZA has a ridiculous soundtrack for this AFRO as well