3/4  W.
Well Made with a Good Script and very Good Performances. Josh Brolin, Richard Dreyfuss and Thandie Newton are all three good and the film is very well told and entertaining, but there are some parts that are not necessary to a film like th... (read full)

3.5/4  I enjoyed it a lot.
As I am against the Bush Administration, I found 'W.' to be a very well made and fascinating film, on the horizon of both a comedy and docu-drama. I have always enjoyed Oliver Stone as a director, but some may argue that this film was made... (read full)

3/4  See It
Josh Brolin shows why he is one of the best working actors today. I was surprise to learn that they didn't make fun of W. like I thought they were going to make fun of W. Oliver Stone just pointed out the obvious. Really great dialog that ... (read full)

1/4  W.
This movie was totally pointless. I don´t know what Oliver Stone tried to say with it; I´m guessing nothing. There were no clear point of you, it was just a story about a man who runs for president. I thought it was insulting to watch Bush... (read full)

2.5/4  Josh is W.
If there is any reason for watching this, it is for seeing Josh imitate our former president. Watching him play W. is the highlight of the film. While the scenes that show a younger Bush are interesting and fun to watch, the ones that ta... (read full)

2.5/4  Stone's best presidential biopic
Well this film is actually an Oliver Stone film I liked a little bit more than others. Although I still did not like it too much to give it 3 stars. The film though is at least humorous and has two good performances, although no one else ... (read full)

2/4  W. Quick Review
I see potential but yet at the same time, it is too much like SNL. Also, not much is known about how true it is. Stone has lost it but at least he tried. I would rather see a better one in 25 years.

3/5 Where's the hook...?
  by Mr. Stephen Kennedy (Doha, Qatar)
Oliver Stone brings his undeniable talent to this biopic of George `Dubya' Bush.. supported by one of those to-die-for casts he seems to have at his beck and call. There's no question this is slickly put together, and that Josh Brolin is completely convincing as the title character .... but as a movie experience there is just something missing.
Stone presents Bush as a follower rather than a leader. Someone who is driven by being under the shadow of his brother in his parents eyes, and whose political drive to succeed is a mirror of his drive to succeed in his father's eyes. Surrounding him, we have a veritable who's who of Hollywood acting as all the well known string pullers behind him and around him - most of whom are thinly drawn, not being the centre of attention - but of all of them, Richard Dreyfuss does a surprisingly good job of fleshing out Dick Cheney. There's a little jolt of energy whenever he has a moment on screen, particularly sparring with Colin Powell. But these are asides, with W's evolving character being the focus, and so as the movie goes on, we see Bush at different times of his life. From College pranks through trying to find a job he wants to keep, meeting Laura, becoming born again (watch out for a great Stacey Keach turn) and starting his political career.. all told non linearly, interspersed with the period of time that will dominate his place in history - going to war with Iraq.
With all those fine ingredients however, it seems that something has been left out - some excitement, some dramatic hook to draw you in. Frankly, Bush's life, rather like his presidency some would argue, is rather dull. In the end, the enjoyment of the movie is in the details.. enjoying watching for Hollywood well known faces playing political well known faces, learning a little about Dubya's earlier life. But we don't come away much richer for the experience. Stone's interpretation of the man is valid, but never feels insightful enough or definitive, neither does it have the cinematic or dramatic energy of, say, `Nixon'. It's not a disaster, but neither does it sparkle. Sometimes interesting, never fascinating. Perhaps it is too soon, and looking back in twenty years or more this will be regarded in higher esteem.


4/5 Good portayal of Bush and ....the administration
  by MN (Venice, CA USA)
I have not bought the dvd for this movie but it may be worthwhile. I would give the movie higher marks than what has been given on imdb and here on amazon. It's a good movie. It not only gives insight on W's earlier life but actually does a rather good portrayal of the administration. I think all the actors in the movie did a fine job in their respective roles. Now as for Thandie Newton's portrayal of Condoleezza Rice. Some say it was awful and cartoonish. I would agree to a certain extent. It made Rice look subservient and dumb. But the characteristics of Rice was quite accurate with a touch of being over the top. You'll definitely catch it and actually made me laugh. But maybe that was the premise of the movie. To have this "loopy" lost feeling to it. Just listen to the soundtrack with the whimsical French accordion playing. You didn't keep your eye on the ball, George. You lost the ball! :)

5/5 Brilliant Portrayal of The Former Presisdent.
  by *Bling-Bling* (Lompoc, CA)
After having watched this film, I have concluded that it is not Anti-Bush nor is it Pro-Bush. The film depicted the former President as a very compassionate individual with the ability to connect to people all across the nation. Also, the film does display moments of where the Former President has his doubts and encounters situations that puts him in a position of uncertainty, such as the ongoing war with Iraq. Iraq was primarily the main focus of the film as it displays how the Bush Administration had dug themselves in a hole with false reports of WMDs being possessed in the middle-east and how they have managed to lose the public opinion on the the war itself. Overall, I've enjoyed this film as I have always been fascinated of just how the now-former-President, had ever came to be the President in the first place. Hindsight, sure has a way with a tragic comedy.

5/5 W the movie
  by Tom C. Whitmore (Chicago, IL USA)
The impression of George Bush is incredibly accurate. It is a mean but, I believe, accurate portrayal.

3/5 W.
  by S. L. Calhoun
Could have chosen someone who favored W. Bush a lot better. Should have stuck to more historic facts. Almost tried to be a comedy, when I expected a true to life fact filled movie.