2/4  The worst of the books
As it should be, the worst of the books became the worst of the movies. As the kids grow, so does their acting ability, which was very weak in the first film. But, this one is only so-so because of two things, the source material was ave... (read full)

2.5/4  A decent sequel
As a follow up this was good. To create a well made sequel, even if it is off of a famous book, is not an easy challenge. The effects were well done, and the adaptation to screenplay was decent. Unfortunately this is also one of Richard Ha... (read full)

2.5/4  Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets Quick Review
Based on my least favorite Potter novel, the film folllows suit. The actors have gotten better, but are still finding their voice. On par with the first, but not better.

5/5 Harry Potter Scores a second O
  by E. Dambrosio (So. Cal.)
After the first succesful movie Harry Potter has again got a perfect score. With new magic and new friends, such as the slightly obnoxious Colin Creevey, and Ron's youngest sibling Ginny Weasley. The movie starts you out with Harry again with the Dursleys living his days wishing time would go faster when a slightly annoying but fun little elf named Dobby comes and visits and gets Harry into a load of trouble in an attempt to keep him away from Hagwarts. His attempt is thwarted by the Weasley brothers who save Harry from the Dursley's oppresion. It was hard fro me to comprehend that Dobby was a CGI for he looked so real and lifelike. The animators are really talented succesfully animating a pheonix and even a giant serpent. Radcliffe is back and as good as ever as Harry Potter. Richard Harris has also returned with a slightly hoarse voice but his performance is as good as ever. The special effects are amazing I don't care what magic they do it's amazing. this movie has again surpassed the book in both action and story. Director Chris Columbas truly has the knack for this making a great adaptation once again. The fight with the basilisk has been redefined and made a full amazing battle instead of a fast swing the sword battle as shown in the book. Now for the bonus features I just got to say. Thank you so much for improving it. I had no trouble whatsoever finding what I wanted finding the deleted scenes with great ease and even some interesting interviews. they seem to have decided to actually put in things that people actually care about as opposed to things no one cares about. Again great movie keep it up!

1/5 Studios for this release ought to be ashame to rerelease this.
  by Scott Denny (Runnemede, New Jersey United States)
You know hear we go again,Now we will get all the blu ray releases released again and claiming to be extreme editions or super editions.The blu ray disc was suppose to be the ultimate form in itself with 7 times the amount of info as the regular blu ray.Now we have the greed factor stepping in and the Studios will start releasing the special editions and super editions on blu ray.Every should not buy any of these special editions on blu ray and stick it to them.I for one will not buy and further editions of Harry poter or any other film without I dont have it already.Shame on you Studios and shame on you Amazon for even selling these.

4/5 Director Is Still Trying To Adapt the Book
  by D. Reed (Elkton, MD USA)
Like the first, the sequel suffers from being too long and literally trying to adapt the book. It worked for Lord of the Rings and they STILL cut out a lot from the books (though they did embelish a little in Two Towers by bringing in the Elves at Helm's Deep but I digress). The young cast has aged a little, clearly for the young men (they're voices are starting to get deeper). Though, to me anyways as I haven't read the books in a while, it gets a little tiring of Ron Weasley being reduced to the comedic sidekick. I know he is one, but not all need to be used for comedic relief. The elder cast is still perfect for their respective roles and Kenneth Branagh is excellent as the ego-centric Lockhart. Again, they could've trimmed up a few things; Harry didn't need to look at every little thing in the Weasley's home (despite the fact that he's not used to magic homes), Ron's slug scene could've been eliminated, some characters that're important in the novel (like Justin and Colin [who at least is important in later books]) are glanced over and are only petrified as that's what happens to them in the book. Still no Peeves (the one character I'm glad they decide to cut out as he adds nothing to the story) and instead of they're ghostly Magical History teacher giving the speech on the Chamber, its McGonagall, which I think is a better switch as they're history teacher is hardly ever mentioned once or twice in the books anyway. Action scenes and CGI are better in this than the last, Dobby and the Basilisk being the highlights of the computer charcters. And hardly any new music from John Williams, who's music from the first film is pretty much tracked to this.

5/5 Review
  by Riley M. Enyert
The item in question arrived here on time and in one peice. They were prompt and no problems arose

3/5 Not bad if you can moderate your expectations
  by Robert Moore (Chicago, IL USA)
This is a fun movie even though it suffers from some of the vices of the first movie in the series and not participating in the virtues of the subsequent films.

There are some things that are better in this film than the first. In particular, Daniel Radcliffe evidences enormous improvement as an actor. And because there is less set up in this one than in the first film, they are able to delve more directly into storytelling. And as in the first film, Hogwarts is rendered memorably. Still, the film is in many ways a disappointment. Chris Columbus's direction was as weak in the second as in the first and either he or the film's editor had to take responsibility for the terrible pacing in many of the film's scenes. On every level, all subsequent films would be better directed and edited. One might quibble over the script, but not the direction and editing. Future films would not drag in individual scenes like in this one.

I do, however, have a lot of problem with the script for this film. Any adaptation of a novel by a movie has to make compromises. Still, ultimately the script has to function as an independent entity. The problem here was the abrupt and inelegant shifts from one scene to another, with no foreshadowing of what would come later or thematic repetition. Few parts of the screenplay resonate with other parts of the screenplay. Now, this very possibly is not the fault of the screenwriter. Directors and editors can radically alter screenplays during the course of filming. so unless we could see the original screenplay and to what degree it was preserved in the filming it is hard to blame the screenwriter. We blame the director. If what was filmed was the writer produced, a writer should have been brought in to fix it. I suspect that the director made changes. Who can say for sure. But one thing is for sure: the film has almost no narrative flow. And as an adaptation of a novel is does a poor job of maintaining its key themes.

Luckily, the movies got much, much better. THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN is by any standard a great film, the best directed film in the series, while the later films were buoyed by very substantive stories. The movies are not nearly as good as the books. That is pretty much par for the course. There have been very, very few movies in the history of film that were better than the novels upon which they were based, except in cases where the novels were not very to begin with.

One of the more humorous sidelights of the film was that some Russians took offense at the film, imagining that the elf Dobby was intended to look like Vladimir Putin. Some Russian lawyers for a while even contemplated taking legal action. There appears to be little justification for such an action. Whatever resemblance between Dobby and Putin would be strictly physical and Dobby in no other way would appear to refer to Putin. I personally think the easily offended lawyers needed to bash their heads a few times on their desks as penance for their silliness.