1/5 Inferior to the 1982 and 1934 version
  by Dr. Anna O. T. Kindy
After reading the book (which I loved) I decided to buy all three verions, the 1934, 1982, and this version. I watched the !982 version first and I absolutly loved it. All the character were so well cast. The script, though not very similar to the book, was brilliant. It was altogether a delightful, witty, and genius adaptation. The same goes for the 1934 version which I watched after this one. When I finished the Anthony Andrews version I almost immediately watched this one, sure that it would be wonderful because A&E almost always does well. I was totally and utterly disappointed.
First of all, the characters were nothing like what they were in the book. RIchard E. Grant who is should rescue aristocrats in a funny, romantic, clever fashion just kills a wack of peoples, and he, who is supposed to be the master of disguise never dresses up once. Percy is supposed to be clever funny, handsome, noble and chivalrous while this guy is just a bum who humiliates his wife in public. The woman who played Marguerite does not look the part, and nor does she act it. Marguerite is supposed to be beautiful clever and witty while she just made me want to fall asleep and throw the remote control at her face. Another thing that really annoyed me is that they didn't seem to figure out wether or not Chauvelin was a good or bad guy. one moment he is helping Percy to rescue another annoying woman, the next he is helps to kidnap the dauphin in order to get money from the republic. Chauvelin is supposed to love his country.
Secondly, why was there so much sex? The characters seemed more concerned in making love than rescuing aristocrats from the guillotine. I was disgusted. It is a pity that peoples now a days love sex scenes and violence so much. And who would want to make love with any of those peoples? Seriously they were disgusting.
Thirdly, the script had nothing to do with the book. It might have been better if the acting but it does not so therefore, I repeat: It was awful. The only thing I had in common with the book was that it was called the Scarlet Pimpernel (As they dare to name it) and the names of the characters. I would have give it minus ten stars but unfortunately that was not an option.
In conclusion this version is trash and I must beg you not to buy this but I truly recomend the Leslie Howard/Merle Orberon and Anthony Andrews/Jane Seymour versions. While not that close to the book they capture the charm, wit, and suspense of the novel wonderfully. But whatever you do, don't pollute your eyes or ears by buying this version.

5/5 The Scarlet Pimpernel
  by Barbara Rustad (La Mesa, CA United States)
I remember enjoying this series when it was broadcast and I enjoy it now. I only wish there were more stories. But I did think the English women's costumes were wrong.

5/5 Love this version and casting of this book!
  by D. S. Irwin (San Antonio)
A&E did taek some liberties with the book but only for the better!! The casting was more believable and realisitic compared to the Jane Seymour farce version. I had seen the A&E version originally on TV and was thrilled to obtain the set for my own personal viewing. I have watched it repeatedly!!! BRAVO!!

4/5 Pretty darn good!
  by D. Fitzgerald (Los Angeles, CA USA)
Between the Horatio Hornblower movies and the Pride and Prejudice set that A&E has released, one has come to expect great things from their classics productions. The Scarlet Pimpernel set is by no means bad but it doesn't quite stand up to their really excellent standards. The directors, I think, are the issue here. The cast is marvelous, Chauvelin in particular! Sir Percy is played by Richard E. Grant who does a very good job. At first, I found him irking and not up to the part. After all, Sir Percy is a man of great depth playing a lazy fool and Grant has simply too much energy. Granted, that this is his greatest drawback is telling. He did end up growing on me quite a bit...perhaps mirroring Marguerite's experience. Fitting, is it not? As to the production as a whole, there was much content added to the first movie which was totally unnecessary (regarding the others, I cannot tell - I've only read the first book). The additions are not disturbing the way unnecessary additions often are, only that there was some rather inappropriate sex which brought down the quality of the films. As far as the direction is concerned, it's the main flaw of the movies. A terrible truth, but there it is. There was too much going on (much unnecessary additions) and thus there wasn't enough time to flesh out all the little conflicts and conversations which made the book so engaging. On the bright side, Chauvelin is amazing, Marguerite is well played, Percy is delightfully devilish, and the costumes are simply gorgeous! Lord, Percy has truly impeccable style. Absolutely wonderful greatcoats! All in all, it was somewhat disappointing but was worth the purchase. I'll be watching these time and again, with greater joy every time no doubt.
A note on the disc features: the only features the discs offer is English subtitles.

4/5 Moderately Entertaining but Lacking Perfection
  by Andrew Raker (PA)
The Scarlet Pimpernel Box Set contains:

Disk 1 The Scarlet Pimpernel
Disk 2 Mademoiselle Guillotine
Disk 3 The Kidnapped King

I enjoyed watching disk 2 Mademoiselle Guillotine the most. It had a relatively easy-to-follow plot-line as well as interesting characters (and decent acting).

The other two episodes were too compacted in my opinion. They combined too much too quickly, leaving the viewer a bit confused (especially if the viewer is not familiar with the novels). Furthermore, while a film should not necessarily be the novel in action, this A&E production takes incredibly liberties with characters and plot.

Now, I purchased "The Scarlet Pimpernal" as part of the A&E romance collection volume 1 from Barnes and Noble during a sale for $49.00. The romance collection volume 1 contained many other A&E romances such as "Pride and Prejudice," "Emma," "Jane Eyre," "Victoria and Albert," and "Ivanhoe." If "The Scarlet Pimpernal" was not part of the collection, I would never have watched A&E's version of "The Scarlet Pimpernal."

As it is, I appreciate the effort, the "Indiana Jones" effect of Richard Grant's acting, and the increased emphasis given to Chauvelin's character. It makes for great action (but maybe not-so-great romance).

Summary: Certainly tolerable, but not nearly so memorable a romance as A&E's "Pride and Prejudice."