1/5 This movie about "Killed" me
  by Kody (New York,NY)
This movie was a waste of time. I hated this movie and hugely angry at myself for even attempting myself to watch it. I'm usually a huge fan of Lindsay Lohan but really.....the movie was just awful. It wasn't her acting is was the plot, base of the story...everything. Lindsay did an amazing job as an actress but its not one of her best. Lindsay may be going through a rough patch in her personal life but I think she's starting to attempt a comeback. Britney Spears made a comeback, and everybody loves her again. But lets hope Lindsay can find her way out. But yeah, it's a horrible, horrible movie! I threw it away or its on the bottom of my movie cabinet, I'm not sure and nor do I care. I've seen way better. Epic failure. 1/5


4/5 Blue
  by A. Szarka (Hawaii)
So i watched this movie 3 times now... and i could watch it another 8 times. I have no idea why but i like this movie a lot. Well for starters, I love the cover box art and that right there is always a plus. I liked Lindsay Lohan in Just My Luck and other such films so what the heck you know? I loved the blue color effect throughout the movie. Blue is one of my fav. colors and it reminded me of Sin City, where the certain color stood out while the rest was all black and white..... The pole dancing was always fun to watch and the movie in general is
good enough to be seen at least once by everyone.

3/5 I'm kind of impartial
  by Braden Pickering (Mesa, AZ)
I think this film was unfairly branded a disaster right from the start because the star, Lindsay Lohan, is more known for being a real-life tranwreck than anything else. But the truth is, I don't mind her as an actress, and she's actually fairly competent in a role that could easily turn into parody and undermine the "heavyness" of what the story is all about. I also thought Julia Ormand was great as the concerned and confused mother.

The plot was interesting, and kept me engaged until the very end, though in the process managed to throw a few curveballs that I felt were unsubstantiated and meant only to make the viewer more confused. It also seemed like the scenes of Lindsay dancing in the strip joint went on forever. I guess a lot of guys wouldn't complain, lol, but it seemed pretty gratuitous anyhow, even if there was no actual nudity. It's like, we get it, you're low class, now move on. Lastly, there was a general "made for tv" feeling about the whole thing, suggesting the budget was limited. That didn't affect the performances, but some of the graphic effects came off as corny.

In the end, I'm impartial to the movie. I found it in the bargain bin at a chain store, and it was worth watching once for the price. I wouldn't necessarily go out of my way to recommend it, but I also felt like I needed to defend it against the people who said it was the epitomy of bad film-making. Rest assured there is certainly worse stuff out there than this little movie.


2/5 messy mixture of sadism and silliness
  by Roland E. Zwick (Valencia, Ca USA)
"I Know Who Killed Me" is a vile little horror outing that was designed as some sort of "comeback" vehicle for Lindsay Lohan back in early 2007. Needless to say, the movie did not succeed in that endeavor. Anything but.

Lohan plays Aubrey Fleming, an attractive, but relatively naive high school student who falls prey to a torture-crazed serial killer who manages to slice off a few of her limbs before she miraculously escapes his clutches. When she wakes up in the hospital, she believes herself to be a girl named Dakota Moss, some kind of fictional "alter ego" with a life straight out of a soft-porn novel - which provides us with ample opportunity to ogle the scantily-clad Lohan as she writhes around in slow-motion performing pole-dances at a sleazy strip joint. Is Aubrey, who is herself a writer of fiction, simply a victim of repression, a wild and free spirit so obsessed with being a "good little girl" that she`s allowed her true nature to remain buried in her subconscious all these years? And is the trauma she's undergone simply the vehicle through which that true nature can now come to the fore? Or is there another, less purely psychological explanation - let's say, symbiotic twins? - for this sudden shift in identity?

It doesn't really matter what the answers to those questions are, for this depressing foray into sadism, dismemberment and supernatural hocus pocus is poorly written, amateurishly acted and completely lacking in either thrills or common sense. Actually, the story itself might have had some validity had it not forced the audience to wallow in as much gratuitous unpleasantness as it does. But, as it is, whenever we begin to develop even the meagerest interest in what is happening, we're subjected to yet another round of stomach-churning bloodletting. Yuck.

3/5 Split Decision
  by Kevin Killian (San Francisco, CA United States)
Well, it took me eons to get through the whole thing, but I wound up admiring the style with which director Chris Sivertson challenges Lindsay Lohan to give it everything she's got in scene after scene of staged contempt, erotic display, and graphic takes of dismemberment and torture.

It's just hard to watch, that's all. Maybe in ten years it will seem like childs play, but as of 2009 the violence against women this film trades in is deeply disturbing and if you ask me, probably pushed La Lohan closer over the edge when she had her famous breakdown. Whether she's playing Dakota or Aubrey, she's the same, but she has some good moments opposite Neal McDonough and Julia Ormond, who play her concerned parents, though McDonough himself evidently knew no one would be watching him anyhow. Ormond on the other hand does exemplary work as the mother, though apparently nobody told her she was in a horror film and she plays out the confused identities Lindsay Lohan performs as though the late Harold Pinter had written it just for her.

Would I watch it again? No way. And how she figured out who killed her I'll never know, but life's too short.